2014 Washington County Virginia Master Gardeners Party.

Good evening, my name is Joe Pippin.  I have been married to your Master Gardener friend Cecelia Pippin for 35 wonderful years.

Frances Matthews Wall is a Lady who has a lot in common with my wife Cecelia.
Fran is a World-Class Woman…a smart, talented, professional educator.

And working for a person like Fran can be a challenge…because her standards are so very… very… very…HIGH.

Fran and I had worked together last year on the Abingdon Garden Club Tour.

But on this project, I really got to know her.

This is Master Gardener Fran the first day of the May 2014 Mid-Atlantic Regional Garden Faire.

Garden Faire 2014 (2)

Fran took her Rose Idea from a phone call in January
to a billboard on Bristol’s Commonwealth Avenue in April:


Fran has another quality in common with my wife.
The word “no” is not in Fran’s vocabulary.
When she asks you to do something and you say “no” …
…that is not an acceptable response!

With that in mind Fran called me and said:
“Joe I want you to photograph a rose for the Garden Faire.”

To which I said “No Fran I don’t think so, why don’t you get a good photographer like Frank Renault.”

To which Fran said “Joe I want you to photograph a rose for the Garden Faire.” So that was decided.

Of course, natural light is always the best. So you want to shoot the Rose outside. This was the first week in January and conditions were perfect.
In fact, we were having a January heat wave.


It was so hot over here, I thought about going over to Wise County,
where it was a little cooler.


Thanks for this amazing image Tim!

Well, we set up inside the garage and living room and got started.

7 6

A couple of questions came up.

For instance, do you want to add something to the Rose photo to make it a little more interesting?

What about Cecelia’s cat Roscoe?


The answer was “no cats on the Garden Faire poster, just the Rose photo.”

The next question was, what color?


Sylvia White promptly said “it has to be Red” so that decision was made.

At this point Sylvia also decided Fran and I needed Adult Supervision.

So the Washington County Virginia Master Gardeners Association took swift and decisive action. It responded to this impending Art Crises … by sending its best and brightest … Lawyer….!10

So from then on, Fran and I worked together on the Rose project, under the watchful eye of Attorney-at-Law Sue B. Slack, Esquire.

Again, like my wife, Fran is a master of executive business principles…such as

“You can delegate so much more than you can do.”

For instance, I said “Fran there are dozens and dozens of ways to take a picture of a rose. What do you want?”

To which Fran said “do them all.”  No Problem.

We ended up with 92 rose photographs. Cecelia has taught Art for 22 years and I enlisted the help of several of her artist friends and our family to look at the photographs and tell me which ones they liked. Thanks to Cecelia, Laurie Young, Frank & Myra Renault, Kathy Gibian, Adelaide Moss, Jan Hurt, Nancy Salyer, Katie Carrico, Jackie Dolpp, Erin Oneisom, Linda Gardner, Pamela Hagy O’Quinn, Candace Nikiforou, Alicia Dotson, Don Pippin and others.
We pared the 92 photographs down to…you guessed it…a dozen roses.

Rose (7) Rose (6) Rose (8) Rose (9) Rose (12) Rose (10) Rose (11) Rose (2) Rose (3) Rose (4) Rose (5) Rose (1)

The Master Gardeners considered these recommendations and made a great choice.

And one more thing about Fran …
she knows what she wants to do and how she is going to do it.

I said “Fran we have roses with light gray backgrounds, blue backgrounds, and dark gray backgrounds.”

To which Fran said “Joe I am going to put your Rose photograph on a black background.”

And did she ever… Here’s the finished product.


And keep in mind, all I did was the Rose photograph…Fran did all the work on this amazing Brochure…and printed 28,000 copies!  (Double click for a more readable image.)



Well done Fran !


Carol Party 7-24-05 (28)

Permit me a few words about our friend Linda Baltimore.

Linda was complicated, wonderful, and interesting.

She owned the Antique Orchard Herbary and I remember one article about her in Better Homes & Gardens.

She was a columnist for the Washington County News writing a regular column titled Cultivating Eden.

Cultivating Eden by Linda Carter Baltimore-3

And of course she was the founder of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Garden Faire.

Linda was so kind and friendly to us when we first moved to Washington County fifteen years ago.

Cecelia & I appreciated Linda so much in 2003 when she featured daughter Laurie’s tulip photo on the Garden Faire posters.

I remember she was a free spirit, the only woman I ever met who played golf bare-footed.

Her Brother Zane described her this way:

Linda was clever and persuasive and loved to write.

She loved intellectually stimulating challenges and had a vivid imagination.

Her enthusiasm was infectious and energized those around her.

Cecelia & I thought everything about Linda was beautiful… inside and out. Beauty was part of her essence.

Linda was a strong Democrat.  I hope she won’t mind me mentioning a Republican.

In his Presidential Inauguration speech, George Herbert Walker Bush talked about volunteers working together to make the world a better place.

And then he said “I look out across America and I see a 1000 Points of Light.”

Think about that image for a moment…a 1000 Points of Light.

When I heard that speech, I thought …I wonder if I will ever meet one of those Points of Light.

Well, I did meet a Point of Light…and her name was Linda Baltimore.

This is a speech about my good Friend Bud Phillips.

The occasion was a reception at The University of Virginia’s College at Wise honoring Bud for being appointed to a Judgeship.


Clarence E. “Bud” Phillips Reception Speech 11-9-2012

Good afternoon.  May it please the Court…

Honorable Judges, Legislators, Distinguished Guests, Family and Friends.

I’m Joe Pippin. I grew up in Coeburn and practiced law in Norton for 25 years before moving across the mountain to Abingdon. But I remain a son of the Coalfields.

Now, before I introduce Bud, permit me to say this about a retired Federal Judge who was a friend to all of us, Glen Williams. We have lost a great one. You can meet with the Family between 4 and 8 pm today at First Christian Church in Pennington Gap. The funeral is Saturday morning at 11 at the same church

And Bud, your friend (and mine) Ronnie Montgomery asked me to convey his congratulations to you and regrets about missing this occasion, but he felt he should be with Glen’s Family. And I’m sure many others in the Lee County Bar feel the same way.

Now…on to the task at hand, introducing our new General District Judge.

I am so glad I get to talk today before Bud speaks.  In law suits over the years when I spoke after Bud, it was like following Frank Sinatra in a talent contest.

Clarence E. (Bud) Phillips was born in April, 1950, in Clintwood, the son of  Clarence and the late Earlene Mullins Phillips. 18 years later he graduated from Ervinton High School 1968.

Next he went to Southwest Virginia Community College where he was elected President of Student Government.  No surprise there.

Bud worked as an underground coal miner for Betty B Coal Company for 2 years while  he earned a B.A. Degree from Clinch Valley College and finally a Masters Degree in Administration and Supervision in 1982 from the school that many simply call, “The University.”

He taught Government at Clintwood High School for 9 years and later served as Principal.

I think you can see where his avid support of education comes from and why, for his entire adult life, Bud Phillips has worked hard to promote educational opportunities for Southwest Virginians.  That’s a big reason I like and respect him so much.

In 1988 Bud earned a Juris Doctorate Equivalency degree from the Virginia State Bar rather than from a law school. You see, Bud studied law the same way as some other folks you may have heard of …

James Monroe 5th President of the United States, author of the Monroe Doctrine which became a landmark in American foreign policy of United States’ opposition to any European intervention in the independent countries of the Americas.

John Marshall, the Chief Justice of the United States (1801–1835) whose court opinions laid the basis for American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court of the United States a coequal branch of government.

And one more…

Thomas Jefferson was an American Founding Father, the principal author of the Declaration of Independence and the third President of the United States. He spoke five languages fluently and was deeply interested in science, invention, architecture, religion and philosophy, which led him to the founding of University of Virginia.  Mr. Jefferson read law as a Law Clerk for George Wythe.

So Bud…you’re in good company.  And so are they.

In 1989 Bud was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates serving the counties of Dickenson, Russell, and Wise and the City of Norton. Committee assignments included General Laws, Privileges and Elections and Appropriations

Let me repeat that…Appropriations. This committee assignment especially  proved so important for Southwest Virginia, and Bud, you used it well for us.

As a Delegate, Bud worked 22 years for all of us. That work involved hundreds of issues and projects, but 15 of them were my favorites:

  • Health care access;

  • Pharmacy Connect;

  • Senior Citizens Programs;

  • Virginia Tobacco Commission legislation;

  • Coal mine safety, workers compensation issues and State Black Lung;

  • Funding for clean drinking water;

  • Coalfield Expressway and Transportation System;

  • Bringing State jobs to Southwest Virginia;

  • Public school funding and quality of education;

  • Higher education funding and programs for the University of Virginia College at Wise, Southwest Virginia Community College and Mountain Empire Community College;

  • Southwest Virginia Tourism Authority;

  • Southwest Virginia Health Authority;

  • Annie’s Law, a Virginia statute that makes it a capital crime for a person 21 or older to kill a child younger than 14, usually understood to be in the context of abuse by the defendant;

  • Protecting landowners’ mineral rights; and

  • Veteran Programs and Benefits.

Bud and his wife Teresa have three children:

     Aimee, Catherine and Garrett and

six grandchildren:

     Daniel, Kaitlyn, Sara,  Delanie, Devin and Markcus

And as if this was not enough, Bud found time to become a cattle farmer extraordinaire and well known for his quality Black Angus beef cattle.

That’s my very short summary of a 25 page resume.

By now Bud is hoping I will stop…but your Honor…not quite yet!

Permit me to talk about a couple of things not on your Resume.

When I had cases against Bud I found him well prepared.  He knew the law and knew his case.  And he was a reasonable man and often we could find common ground and settle the case to both side’s satisfaction.

Bud called me on a case recently and requested I be his co-counsel. I remember I said “Bud you know I have friends on both sides of the aisle”… and Bud said “So do I.”  What a refreshing attitude in this age of partisan bickering and gridlock.

That case was finished just days before he went on the Bench.  It was something you would expect Bud Phillips to be working on…providing internet service to an Elementary School .  A site was needed to build a cellular tower and we had to get the necessary land.

You see, the children in that school needed internet access to take the Standards of Learning tests. When education needed a Friend, Bud Phillips got the call.

Believe me, being co-counsel with Bud Phillips was as good as it gets.

Cases have high points and low points.  Bud is a co-counsel who knows what to do at one of those low points.

Now what do I mean by that?  Let me see if I can give you mental image:

You remember that scene in the Ten Commandments when the Israelites came up to the Red Sea and the Egyptians were charging down on them in the chariots with the spears…

Do you remember what happened?

Charleston Heston walks over …opens his arms…and the sea parts!

That’s what Bud Phillips could do for a case stuck in the legal mud.

Are Bud and Teresa’s grandchildren in the audience?   I’ve got news for you…when Bud is out in the real world…your Grandpa is like a Rock Star!

It’s fun to be co-counsel with a Rock Star!  People loved to see him!

And when I was with him, I got to see just how much people cared about him.

And I saw how much Bud Phillips genuinely cared about them.

Once after a 10 hour day in Court we were making our way down the sidewalk to our vehicle.  Literally every person we saw stopped Bud to talk.  And they were so glad to see him.

I decided to just ask the next family

…”what did Bud do for you?”  So I did.

The man answered, “he’s the best friend our Family ever had…and he got us $750,000 on our case.”

I agree with that guy… Bud Phillips is a Great trial lawyer!

So now Bud is on the Bench.  And we all have to say “Judge Phillips” instead of Bud…that will take some getting used to.

But I am glad he is a Judge.  Why? Because our system of Justice, a system people have gone to War and fought and died for, can be no better than the Judges who serve it.

It’s important that our Judges have a good knowledge of the law.

But it’s just as important that our Judges be good people.

I have known Bud Phillips for over 2 decades and I can assure you he has the right combination of Head and Heart to be a great Judge.

And I am absolutely certain that, with Bud Phillips on the bench, Justice will be served.

Thank you and Congratulations Judge Phillips!


August 28, 1963


March on Washington, August 28, 1963

March on Washington, August 28, 1963

March on Washington, August 28, 1963

March on Washington, August 28, 1963

March on Washington, August 28, 1963

March on Washington, August 28, 1963


John F. Kennedy

January 20, 1961

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you;
ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you,
but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

Inaugural Address

Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens:

We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom — symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning — signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago.

The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe — the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.

We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans — born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage, and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.

This much we pledge — and more.

To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do — for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.

To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom — and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.

To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.

To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge: to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.

To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support — to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective, to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak, and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.

But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course — both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind’s final war.

So let us begin anew — remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.

Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us.

Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms, and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.

Let both sides unite to heed, in all corners of the earth, the command of Isaiah — to “undo the heavy burdens, and [to] let the oppressed go free.”¹

And, if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor — not a new balance of power, but a new world of law — where the strong are just, and the weak secure, and the peace preserved.

All this will not be finished in the first one hundred days. Nor will it be finished in the first one thousand days; nor in the life of this Administration; nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

Now the trumpet summons us again — not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need — not as a call to battle, though embattled we are — but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, “rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation,”² a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.

Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?

In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility — I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it. And the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.

Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

July 2, 1932

“I Pledge You—I Pledge Myself to a New Deal for the American People.”

Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the

Democratic National Convention in Chicago

Chairman Walsh, my friends of the Democratic National Convention of 1932:

I appreciate your willingness after these six arduous days to remain here, for I know well the sleepless hours which you and I have had. I regret that I am late, but I have no control over the winds of Heaven and could only be thankful for my Navy training.

The appearance before a National Convention of its nominee for President, to be formally notified of his selection, is unprecedented and unusual, but these are unprecedented and unusual times. I have started out on the tasks that lie ahead by breaking the absurd traditions that the candidate should remain in professed ignorance of what has happened for weeks until he is formally notified of that event many weeks later.

My friends, may this be the symbol of my intention to be honest and to avoid all hypocrisy or sham, to avoid all silly shutting of the eyes to the truth in this campaign. You have nominated me and I know it, and I am here to thank you for the honor.

Let it also be symbolic that in so doing I broke traditions. Let it be from now on the task of our Party to break foolish traditions. We will break foolish traditions and leave it to the Republican leadership, far more skilled in that art, to break promises.

Let us now and here highly resolve to resume the country’s interrupted march along the path of real progress, of real justice, of real equality for all of our citizens, great and small. Our indomitable leader in that interrupted march is no longer with us, but there still survives today his spirit. Many of his captains, thank God, are still with us, to give us wise counsel. Let us feel that in everything we do there still lives with us, if not the body, the great indomitable, unquenchable, progressive soul of our Commander-in-Chief, Woodrow Wilson.

I have many things on which I want to make my position clear at the earliest possible moment in this campaign. That admirable document, the platform which you have adopted, is clear. I accept it 100 percent.

And you can accept my pledge that I will leave no doubt or ambiguity on where I stand on any question of moment in this campaign.

As we enter this new battle, let us keep always present with us some of the ideals of the Party: The fact that the Democratic Party by tradition and by the continuing logic of history, past and present, is the bearer of liberalism and of progress and at the same time of safety to our institutions. And if this appeal fails, remember well, my friends, that a resentment against the failure of Republican leadership–and note well that in this campaign I shall not use the word “Republican Party,” but I shall use, day in and day out, the words, “Republican leadership”–the failure of Republican leaders to solve our troubles may degenerate into unreasoning radicalism.

The great social phenomenon of this depression, unlike others before it, is that it has produced but a few of the disorderly manifestations that too often attend upon such times.

Wild radicalism has made few converts, and the greatest tribute that I can pay to my countrymen is that in these days of crushing want there persists an orderly and hopeful spirit on the part of the millions of our people who have suffered so much. To fail to offer them a new chance is not only to betray their hopes but to misunderstand their patience.

To meet by reaction that danger of radicalism is to invite disaster. Reaction is no barrier to the radical. It is a challenge, a provocation. The way to meet that danger is to offer a workable program of reconstruction, and the party to offer it is the party with clean hands.

This, and this only, is a proper protection against blind reaction on the one hand and an improvised, hit-or-miss, irresponsible opportunism on the other.

There are two ways of viewing the Government’s duty in matters affecting economic and social life. The first sees to it that a favored few are helped and hopes that some of their prosperity will leak through, sift through, to labor, to the farmer, to the small business man. That theory belongs to the party of Toryism, and I had hoped that most of the Tories left this country in 1776

But it is not and never will be the theory of the Democratic Party. This is no time for fear, for reaction or for timidity. Here and now I invite those nominal Republicans who find that their conscience cannot be squared with the groping and the failure of their party leaders to join hands with us; here and now, in equal measure, I warn those nominal Democrats who squint at the future with their faces turned toward the past, and who feel no responsibility to the demands of the new time, that they are out of step with their Party.

Yes, the people of this country want a genuine choice this year, not a choice between two names for the same reactionary doctrine. Ours must be a party of liberal thought, of planned action, of enlightened international outlook, and of the greatest good to the greatest number of our citizens.

Now it is inevitable–and the choice is that of the times–it is inevitable that the main issue of this campaign should revolve about the clear fact of our economic condition, a depression so deep that it is without precedent in modern history. It will not do merely to state, as do Republican leaders to explain their broken promises of continued inaction, that the depression is worldwide. That was not their explanation of the apparent prosperity of 1928. The people will not forget the claim made by them then that prosperity was only a domestic product manufactured by a Republican President and a Republican Congress. If they claim paternity for the one they cannot deny paternity for the other.

I cannot take up all the problems today. I want to touch on a few that are vital. Let us look a little at the recent history and the simple economics, the kind of economics that you and I and the average man and woman talk.

In the years before 1929 we know that this country had completed a vast cycle of building and inflation; for ten years we expanded on the theory of repairing the wastes of the War, but actually expanding far beyond that, and also beyond our natural and normal growth. Now it is worth remembering, and the cold figures of finance prove it, that during that time there was little or no drop in the prices that the consumer had to pay, although those same figures proved that the cost of production fell very greatly; corporate profit resulting from this period was enormous; at the same time little of that profit was devoted to the reduction of prices. The consumer was forgotten. Very little of it went into increased wages; the worker was forgotten, and by no means an adequate proportion was even paid out in dividends–the stockholder was forgotten.

And, incidentally, very little of it was taken by taxation to the beneficent Government of those years.

What was the result? Enormous corporate surpluses piled up– the most stupendous in history. Where, under the spell of delirious speculation, did those surpluses go? Let us talk economics that the figures prove and that we can understand. Why, they went chiefly in two directions: first, into new and unnecessary plants which now stand stark and idle; and second, into the call-money market of Wall Street, either directly by the corporations, or indirectly through the banks. Those are the facts. Why blink at them?

Then came the crash. You know the story. Surpluses invested in unnecessary plants became idle. Men lost their jobs; purchasing power dried up; banks became frightened and started calling loans. Those who had money were afraid to part with it. Credit contracted. Industry stopped. Commerce declined, and unemployment mounted.

And there we are today.

Translate that into human terms. See how the events of the past three years have come home to specific groups of people: first, the group dependent on industry; second, the group dependent on agriculture; third, and made up in large part of members of the first two groups, the people who are called “small investors and depositors.” In fact, the strongest possible tie between the first two groups, agriculture and industry, is the fact that the savings and to a degree the security of both are tied together in that third group–the credit structure of the Nation.

Never in history have the interests of all the people been so united in a single economic problem. Picture to yourself, for instance, the great groups of property owned by millions of our citizens, represented by credits issued in the form of bonds and mortgages–Government bonds of all kinds, Federal, State, county, municipal; bonds of industrial companies, of utility companies; mortgages on real estate in farms and cities, and finally the vast investments of the Nation in the railroads. What is the measure of the security of each of those groups? We know well that in our complicated, interrelated credit structure if any one of these credit groups collapses they may all collapse. Danger to one is danger to all.

How, I ask, has the present Administration in Washington treated the interrelationship of these credit groups? The answer is clear: It has not recognized that interrelationship existed at all. Why, the Nation asks, has Washington failed to understand that all of these groups, each and every one, the top of the pyramid and the bottom of the pyramid, must be considered together, that each and every one of them is dependent on every other; each and every one of them affecting the whole financial fabric?

Statesmanship and vision, my friends, require relief to all at the same time.

Just one word or two on taxes, the taxes that all of us pay toward the cost of Government of all kinds.

I know something of taxes. For three long years I have been going up and down this country preaching that Government–Federal and State and local–costs too much. I shall not stop that preaching. As an immediate program of action we must abolish useless offices. We must eliminate unnecessary functions of Government–functions, in fact, that are not definitely essential to the continuance of Government. We must merge, we must consolidate subdivisions of Government, and, like the private citizen, give up luxuries which we can no longer afford.

By our example at Washington itself, we shall have the opportunity of pointing the way of economy to local government, for let us remember well that out of every tax dollar in the average State in this Nation, 40 cents enter the treasury in Washington, D. C., 10 or 12 cents only go to the State capitals, and 48 cents are consumed by the costs of local government in counties and cities and towns.

I propose to you, my friends, and through you, that Government of all kinds, big and little, be made solvent and that the example be set by the President of the United States and his Cabinet.

And talking about setting a definite example, I congratulate this convention for having had the courage fearlessly to write into its declaration of principles what an overwhelming majority here assembled really thinks about the 18th Amendment. This convention wants repeal. Your candidate wants repeal. And I am confident that the United States of America wants repeal.

Two years ago the platform on which I ran for Governor the second time contained substantially the same provision. The overwhelming sentiment of the people of my State, as shown by the vote of that year, extends, I know, to the people of many of the other States. I say to you now that from this date on the 18th Amendment is doomed. When that happens, we as Democrats must and will, rightly and morally, enable the States to protect themselves against the importation of intoxicating liquor where such importation may violate their State laws. We must rightly and morally prevent the return of the saloon.

To go back to this dry subject of finance, because it all ties in together–the 18th Amendment has something to do with finance, too–in a comprehensive planning for the reconstruction of the great credit groups, including Government credit, I list an important place for that prize statement of principle in the platform here adopted calling for the letting in of the light of day on issues of securities, foreign and domestic, which are offered for sale to the investing public.

My friends, you and I as common-sense citizens know that it would help to protect the savings of the country from the dishonesty of crooks and from the lack of honor of some men in high financial places. Publicity is the enemy of crookedness.

And now one word about unemployment, and incidentally about agriculture. I have favored the use of certain types of public works as a further emergency means of stimulating employment and the issuance of bonds to pay for such public works, but I have pointed out that no economic end is served if we merely build without building for a necessary purpose. Such works, of course, should insofar as possible be self-sustaining if they are to be financed by the issuing of bonds. So as to spread the points of all kinds as widely as possible, we must take definite steps to shorten the working day and the working week.

Let us use common sense and business sense. Just as one example, we know that a very hopeful and immediate means of relief, both for the unemployed and for agriculture, will come from a wide plan of the converting of many millions of acres of marginal and unused land into timberland through reforestation. There are tens of millions of acres east of the Mississippi River alone in abandoned farms, in cut-over land, now growing up in worthless brush. Why, every European Nation has a definite land policy, and has had one for generations. We have none. Having none, we face a future of soil erosion and timber famine. It is clear that economic foresight and immediate employment march hand in hand in the call for the reforestation of these vast areas.

In so doing, employment can be given to a million men. That is the kind of public work that is self-sustaining, and therefore capable of being financed by the issuance of bonds which are made secure by the fact that the growth of tremendous crops will provide adequate security for the investment.

Yes, I have a very definite program for providing employment by that means. I have done it, and I am doing it today in the State of New York. I know that the Democratic Party can do it successfully in the Nation. That will put men to work, and that is an example of the action that we are going to have.

Now as a further aid to agriculture, we know perfectly well– but have we come out and said so clearly and distinctly?–we should repeal immediately those provisions of law that compel the Federal Government to go into the market to purchase, to sell, to speculate in farm products in a futile attempt to reduce farm surpluses. And they are the people who are talking of keeping Government out of business. The practical way to help the farmer is by an arrangement that will, in addition to lightening some of the impoverishing burdens from his back, do something toward the reduction of the surpluses of staple commodities that hang on the market. It should be our aim to add to the world prices of staple products the amount of a reasonable tariff protection, to give agriculture the same protection that industry has today.

And in exchange for this immediately increased return I am sure that the farmers of this Nation would agree ultimately to such planning of their production as would reduce the surpluses and make it unnecessary in later years to depend on dumping those surpluses abroad in order to support domestic prices. That result has been accomplished in other Nations; why not in America, too?

Farm leaders and farm economists, generally, agree that a plan based on that principle is a desirable first step in the reconstruction of agriculture. It does not in itself furnish a complete program, but it will serve in great measure in the long run to remove the pall of a surplus without the continued perpetual threat of world dumping. Final voluntary reduction of surplus is a part of our objective, but the long continuance and the present burden of existing surpluses make it necessary to repair great damage of the present by immediate emergency measures.

Such a plan as that, my friends, does not cost the Government any money, nor does it keep the Government in business or in speculation.

As to the actual wording of a bill, I believe that the Democratic Party stands ready to be guided by whatever the responsible farm groups themselves agree on. That is a principle that is sound; and again I ask for action.

One more word about the farmer, and I know that every delegate in this hall who lives in the city knows why I lay emphasis on the farmer. It is because one-half of our population, over 50,000,000 people, are dependent on agriculture; and, my friends, if those 50,000,000 people have no money, no cash, to buy what is produced in the city, the city suffers to an equal or greater extent.

That is why we are going to make the voters understand this year that this Nation is not merely a Nation of independence, but it is, if we are to survive, bound to be a Nation of interdependence–town and city, and North and South, East and West. That is our goal, and that goal will be understood by the people of this country no matter where they live.

Yes, the purchasing power of that half of our population dependent on agriculture is gone. Farm mortgages reach nearly ten billions of dollars today and interest charges on that alone are $560,000,000 a year. But that is not all. The tax burden caused by extravagant and inefficient local government is an additional factor. Our most immediate concern should be to reduce the interest burden on these mortgages.

Rediscounting of farm mortgages under salutary restrictions must be expanded and should, in the future, be conditioned on the reduction of interest rates. Amortization payments, maturities should likewise in this crisis be extended before rediscount is permitted where the mortgagor is sorely pressed. That, my friends, is another example of practical, immediate relief: Action.

I aim to do the same thing, and it can be done, for the small home-owner in our cities and villages. We can lighten his burden and develop his purchasing power. Take away, my friends, that spectre of too high an interest rate. Take away that spectre of the due date just a short time away. Save homes; save homes for thousands of self-respecting families, and drive out that spectre of insecurity from our midst.

Out of all the tons of printed paper, out of all the hours of oratory, the recriminations, the defenses, the happy-thought plans in Washington and in every State, there emerges one great, simple, crystal-pure fact that during the past ten years a Nation of 120,000,000 people has been led by the Republican leaders to erect an impregnable barbed wire entanglement around its borders through the instrumentality of tariffs which have isolated us from all the other human beings in all the rest of the round world. I accept that admirable tariff statement in the platform of this convention. It would protect American business and American labor. By our acts of the past we have invited and received the retaliation of other Nations. I propose an invitation to them to forget the past, to sit at the table with us, as friends, and to plan with us for the restoration of the trade of the world.

Go into the home of the business man. He knows what the tariff has done for him. Go into the home of the factory worker. He knows why goods do not move. Go into the home of the farmer. He knows how the tariff has helped to ruin him.

At last our eyes are open. At last the American people are ready to acknowledge that Republican leadership was wrong and that the Democracy is right.

My program, of which I can only touch on these points, is based upon this simple moral principle: the welfare and the soundness of a Nation depend first upon what the great mass of the people wish and need; and second, whether or not they are getting it.

What do the people of America want more than anything else? To my mind, they want two things: work, with all the moral and spiritual values that go with it; and with work, a reasonable measure of security–security for themselves and for their wives and children. Work and security–these are more than words. They are more than facts. They are the spiritual values, the true goal toward which our efforts of reconstruction should lead. These are the values that this program is intended to gain; these are the values we have failed to achieve by the leadership we now have.

Our Republican leaders tell us economic laws–sacred, inviolable, unchangeable–cause panics which no one could prevent. But while they prate of economic laws, men and women are starving. We must lay hold of the fact that economic laws are not made by nature. They are made by human beings.

Yes, when–not if–when we get the chance, the Federal Government will assume bold leadership in distress relief. For years Washington has alternated between putting its head in the sand and saying there is no large number of destitute people in our midst who need food and clothing, and then saying the States should take care of them, if there are. Instead of planning two and a half years ago to do what they are now trying to do, they kept putting it off from day to day, week to week, and month to month, until the conscience of America demanded action.

I say that while primary responsibility for relief rests with localities now, as ever, yet the Federal Government has always had and still has a continuing responsibility for the broader public welfare. It will soon fulfill that responsibility.

And now, just a few words about our plans for the next four months. By coming here instead of waiting for a formal notification, I have made it clear that I believe we should eliminate expensive ceremonies and that we should set in motion at once, tonight, my friends, the necessary machinery for an adequate presentation of the issues to the electorate of the Nation.

I myself have important duties as Governor of a great State, duties which in these times are more arduous and more grave than at any previous period. Yet I feel confident that I shall be able to make a number of short visits to several parts of the Nation. My trips will have as their first objective the study at first hand, from the lips of men and women of all parties and all occupations, of the actual conditions and needs of every part of an interdependent country.

One word more: Out of every crisis, every tribulation, every disaster, mankind rises with some share of greater knowledge, of higher decency, of purer purpose. Today we shall have come through a period of loose thinking, descending morals, an era of selfishness, among individual men and women and among Nations. Blame not Governments alone for this. Blame ourselves in equal share. Let us be frank in acknowledgment of the truth that many amongst us have made obeisance to Mammon, that the profits of speculation, the easy road without toil, have lured us from the old barricades. To return to higher standards we must abandon the false prophets and seek new leaders of our own choosing.

Never before in modern history have the essential differences between the two major American parties stood out in such striking contrast as they do today. Republican leaders not only have failed in material things, they have failed in national vision, because in disaster they have held out no hope, they have pointed out no path for the people below to climb back to places of security and of safety in our American life.

Throughout the Nation, men and women, forgotten in the political philosophy of the Government of the last years look to us here for guidance and for more equitable opportunity to share in the distribution of national wealth.

On the farms, in the large metropolitan areas, in the smaller cities and in the villages, millions of our citizens cherish the hope that their old standards of living and of thought have not gone forever. Those millions cannot and shall not hope in vain.

I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people. Let us all here assembled constitute ourselves prophets of a new order of competence and of courage. This is more than a political campaign; it is a call to arms. Give me your help, not to win votes alone, but to win in this crusade to restore America to its own people.

APP Note: In the Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, this document is sub-titled, “I Pledge You—I Pledge Myself to a New Deal for the American People.”


May 22, 1964

1964-Johnson-1 1964-Johnson-2 1964-Johnson-3

May 22, 1964